Showing posts with label Steve. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Steve. Show all posts

Wednesday, 24 August 2011

Steve James: farcical events at Glamorgan raise eyebrows in Australia

With so much international cricket being played year-round around the globe, its newspaper coverage may have shrunk, but it still has its legion of supporters and followers. Many of them may be latent – for each of the last two seasons the Cricinfo website has recorded some 30 million hits on its county cricket pages – but they are there.

As indeed I have discovered many miles away here in Australia. There I was at the Gabba the day before the first Test, trying to watch the various net sessions (with Doug Bollinger clearly making the point that he did not like being left out of the Australia side by bowling at the speed of light) and familiarise myself with new surroundings, while rather a lot of people seemed to want to ask only one question: “What on earth is happening at Glamorgan?” And the inquisitors were not all Welsh! Given the mountains of correspondence and calls I have received in the last couple of weeks, I very nearly called a press conference after the captains Andrew Strauss and Ricky Ponting had uttered their pre-series war cries.

“Everyone has resigned, haven’t they?” remarked one top-notch sports writer. Well, not quite, but three in a week is pretty unprecedented. That is captain Jamie Dalrymple, who was sacked and then resigned from the club, director of cricket Matthew Maynard and then president Peter Walker in disgust. Oscar Wilde might have had something to say about this. One? Unfortunate. Two? Careless. Three? Just plain stupid.

As cock-ups go Glamorgan’s recent actions have been top-rank. They wanted to improve matters; instead they have made them many times worse. The broad principles of their thinking were actually reasonably sound. Dalrymple is a fine cricketer – indeed I stand by my assertion three years ago that he was Glamorgan’s best-ever domestic signing – but he is no Mike Brearley. Maynard is a sharp coach, happiest with tracksuit on, but not a director of cricket with all its attendant duties. So to sack Dalrymple and demote Maynard was not wildly ill-advised. But the manner of its implementation, as well as the choice of replacements, was quite shambolic.

Glamorgan wanted Ponting or Graeme Smith to captain. They ended up with Alviro Petersen. It is not quite the same. They say they conducted a worldwide search for a managing director of cricket and ended up with Colin Metson, a former Glamorgan wicketkeeper and recently chairman of their cricket advisory group, but with little experience or knowledge of top-level cricket recently. Perhaps more pertinently he is a friend of chairman Paul Russell.

What is more nobody told Maynard he was being demoted before Russell, Metson and chief executive Alan Hamer took a trip to Dubai to sign Petersen during the recent South Africa versus Pakistan Test series. There has been a nice video clip doing the email rounds showing all three sitting in the stands. Caught red-handed.

There are a couple of wider issues to consider here. Firstly the importance of one-day cricket. Glamorgan missed championship promotion by a whisker (a mutton-headed Sussex declaration handed Worcestershire the spot instead) but yet again were woeful in the one-day stuff. That is where the cash cow lies. The players profess the championship to be the most-prized competition, but the bean counters beg to differ.

Secondly the influence of the county chairman. It is a role that has changed dramatically. Once it was mainly a ceremonial post; now many chairmen prop up their counties financially. Russell certainly does at Glamorgan. And with that comes power.

But the trouble is that very few of these men know their cricket. They think they do, but the truth is they do not. At heart they are just fans. They get star-struck like everyone else. So they make decisions in sport that they would never make in business.

Then business and cricketing needs become confused when they are asked to make decisions about the domestic cricketing structure. Most culpably, though, some poke their noses into team affairs. That was cited as a reason for chief executive David Smith’s resignation at Leicestershire earlier this year. Eventually, after much acrimony, the chairman Neil Davidson resigned too.

A quote from Sir Alex Ferguson strikes a chord: “I am the most important man at Manchester United. It has to be that way,” the manager said recently.

So it should be in cricket. Leave the cricket to the experts.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Saturday, 2 July 2011

Apple's Steve Jobs took sick leave: what markets are saying

Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs taking medical leave, two years after a pause six months when he underwent a liver transplant. Photo: REX

"This time you have questioned its ability to rebound." They were never discussed a succession plan, but it is quite clear that Cook is the guy. I feel like they're being faster and original on the issue. They were clearly appointed who is responsible, Tim Cook. Apple clearly has a very deep bench, it is only jobs. I think that people would decrease the depth of the team at Apple. There is no operational risk for the story, but there is a perceived risk. »


"Short and medium term Apple will continue as usual." Tim Cook is extremely highly regarded, the pipeline for stuff that will be announced this summer has probably already been muzzled, so it isn't as if everything goes to disintegrate in the next six months.


"The role of Mr. jobs is the editor of last resort." He is the guy who looks at a product and said "it is not good enough, you have to go further and do better." Editing and quality control, it provides what they ship has been so important to the success of Apple and thus show after a two and three and four years, i.e. where Apple would really start to feel his absence.


"If it is not able to play the role of Apple, there in the past, is in the display for two or three years, the product range is affected.


"This is bad news for Apple as long as investors are concerned with position more long-term Steve Jobs." But the real impact on the company and its operations will be limited. Jobs continues to be involved in major decisions and Tim Cook has good experience on the day the day of the company.


"Tim is perhaps not as charismatic: Steve but he commands enormous respect….It is very grounded and at the top of products. »


"Apple is always very well performing sales-wise and I don't think people stop buying their product because Steve jobs took sick leave."


"This coming surprise to Apple investors and certainly take some shine off the stock of Apple." But even if never Steve Jobs returns to Apple, I would expect no visible impact and tangible on how Apple is running in the next few years.


"Long-term, you might suspect that because Apple is becoming a very large organization, it may lose some of its edge innovative." The fact that all Apple products placed on the market was followed closely by jobs, also also meant something for what they put on the market.


"But it is something that might pan out for a few years." What they have now in store sufficient to keep them going for a while. »


"It is surprising and not great for Steve himself obviously." We were here before the beginning of 2009, so it will probably be similar to that. Operationally, the company is very well last time, there are some jobs premium in stock but it will be the concern.


"Honestly, the effect on society probably not be that great in terms of fundamental principles." Perception of the company is another matter. Steve Jobs is regarded by the market as a major force in the strategic direction of Apple. If his pancreatic cancer is back, one might be very worried. »


"The reflex is likely to be negative. However, I think Apple is clearly a much larger company to one person and we now have a proof of last point that the company was in safe hands with Tim Cook safe step and I don't think that they get away from their current. »


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.